25 reviews over 10 days from 25 unique wallets. Average on-chain rating: 92/100. 4% came back. 25 reviews from 24 wallets; avg 1.0 reviews per wallet. One wallet reviewed 2 times.
Mar 1Now
Reviewer Health
Almost every reviewer was unique; 25 different wallets left 25 reviews. But 95% of those wallets reviewed within the same 24-hour window. That combination — unique wallets all reviewing at once — is a signature of manufactured reviews.
Reviewer Diversity
0.96
25 unique wallets left 25 reviews. Almost every review came from a different wallet.
Review Burst
95%
95% of all reviewers submitted within the same 24-hour window. Organic reviews typically trickle in over time.
Pattern Analysis
22 reviewer wallets analyzed. No suspicious patterns detected. Note: 100% of reviewer wallets are over 30 days old, which looks healthy on its own. The severity flag is driven by coordination patterns (many wallets acting in unison) rather than wallet age alone.
How severity is calculated
Each signal has a weight: common funder (6x), inhuman velocity (5x), sweep pattern (3x), score clustering (1x). The weighted score is the sum of (wallets matched x weight) for each signal.
100% of reviewer wallets are over 30 days old. Established wallets are harder to manufacture.
Score Distribution
Scores given by reviewers
9599
All reviews (22)
Funding Source Analysis
The agent's own owner wallet sent the first-ever funds to 5 wallets that then reviewed this agent. The money trail forms a closed loop: owner funds wallets, wallets review the owner's agent.
The wallet behind this agent has been active for 1 year, 11 months (713 days). It has never been transferred; same owner since registration. The wallet itself is established; the question is about the reviews, not the owner.
1 year, 11 months
Wallet age score: 100/100. Wallets active for over a year score 100; brand-new wallets score 0. Older wallets are harder to fabricate.
Registration Quality
Registration Quality Score
Metadata completeness and endpoint liveness. Not a trust judgment — a completeness report.
20/ 100
Minimal registration
Identity
20 / 40
Connectivity
0 / 25
History
0 / 35
No type field in metadataNo agentWallet fieldNo domain or website declaredNo service endpoints declaredNo feedback receivedresolved:enriched_from_computednot_in_subgraph
Agents can be the target of fake reviews they didn't request. This tool will let agents disavow suspicious reviews so they're excluded from score calculation.
In Development
The ledger shows
Real wallet. Manufactured reviews. You decide what that means.
Scores reflect algorithmic analysis of publicly available blockchain data and may be affected by network delays or API errors. Flags describe patterns, not intent. This agent may be the beneficiary, the victim, or uninvolved. Not financial, legal, or compliance advice. Terms